Pages

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Map of September 11th Terrorist Attacks

Reposted

In honor of those who died serving themselves, their families, their friends, and their country. Rest in Peace

To add your story or to read others on a Google Street View Map click here (via Google Maps Mania). Another map shows the international loss of life caused by al Qaeda terrorists on September 11th.

Flight paths of the hijacked planes on 9/11 (click to go to interactive timeline)

Map of the Attack on the Pentagon by American Airlines Flight 93 (click to enlarge)


Map of American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175's impact into the World Trade Center (click to enlarge)

9/11/2012

To all those who have have suffered because of terrorism...
From wikipedia

to all those who have fought against terrorism...
Unknown origin.
 and to all those who have campaigned against terrorism by advocating what is right...
From the Catholic Church
May God bless you and may we never forget you

Sunday, September 09, 2012

Syria Civil War Maps: Batch Nine - September 2012

Many thanks to FSSP for making this post.

Libyan War Maps 
Syrian Arab Spring Protest Maps - Batch One
Syria Civil War Maps Batch Two - Syrian Air Defenses 
Syria Civil War Maps Batch Three - Twitter and News Update Maps 
Syria Civil War Maps Batch Four - The Soccer Map  
Syria Civil War Maps: Batch Five - Ceasefire Violations
Syria Civil War Maps: Batch Six - Houla   
Syria Civil War Maps: Batch Seven - June 2012    
Syria Civil War Maps: Batch Eight - Battle of Damascus 
Syria Civil War Maps: Batch Nine - September 2012 
Syria Civil War Maps Batch Ten - October 2012 
Syria Civil War Maps Batch Eleven - Propaganda Maps
Syria Civil War Maps Batch Twelve - First Quarter 2013

Syria Civil War Maps Batch Thirteen - Chemical Weapons Attack?
Syria Civil War Maps Batch Fourteen - Israel Strikes Again
Syria Civil War Maps Batch Fifteen - Second Quarter 2013
Syria Civil War Maps Batch Sixteen - The Coming Western Intervention
Syria Civil War Maps Batch Seventeen - Al Qaedastan in Iraq and Syria

The Turkish newspaper Hurriyet Daily News has made a map and article showing the locations of rebel forces throughout Syria.  The map and article make clear that the Free Syrian Army is more of a mish-mash of organizations and is not the only rebel organization.

Click to enlarge

The Indian newspaper Hindustan Times has a map and article depicting the Syrian Civil War in the context of the greater Saudi Arabian versus Iran Cold War.

Click to Enlarge
LiveLeak user "CptSpaulding" claims to have created maps showing the advancement of Syrian Arab Republic forces against Free Syrian Army and Kurdish forces from late August to early September.

Late August.  Click to enlarge

Early September.  Click to Enlarge.

Friday, September 07, 2012

Douentza's Fall is Azawad's Fall

Azawad, the de facto independent republic and de facto newest country in the world, is about to fade into the sands of the Sahara.  The strategic town of Douentza, who's fall in April created a border and allowed for rebels to declare independence, was captured by Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (MOJWA) this past weekend.  The town was previously held by an Azawad-allied militia.  MOJWA's victory is a major defeat for those who desired Azawad's independence. 

MOJWA is an Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and is allied to Ansar Dine.  Both of these militant Islamist groups seek to rule all of Mali, not just the Tureg north, and impose Sharia law.  While Azawad forces have been key in winning battles in northern Mali against government forces, the Islamists move into the towns claiming to be allies but quickly impose their own rule.  The cities of Gao and Timbuktu have been slowly but surely purged of secular elements as the Salafist Islamists destroy Sufi Muslim shrines and impose Sharia law.  Now there is no significant city or town in the self-proclaimed Azawad under complete secular militia control.

Azawad's inability to control its own claimed and conquered territory is a sure sign to the world that the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad's efforts are not worth backing.  Whether it takes a long covert war or an all out Malian offensive, Azawad will become just northern Mali yet again.

Wednesday, September 05, 2012

Party Platforms and Jerusalem: Part 2

The Democratic Party's change to its platform's call to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel reached the highest realm of comedic political theater.



The Democratic Party amended its platform so that Jerusalem should be recognized as the capital.  It now reads

Jerusalem is and will remain the capital of Israel.  The parties have agreed that Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations.  It should remain an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths.

For such a minor thing (which no president is ever likely to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital before a major peace negotiation breakthrough) in an economy-focused election demonstrates just how passionate the subject is.

Of an interest note is the Republican Party's moderation on the issue.  A long time reader and Democratic Party activist pointed out the differences between the 2008 and 2012 Republican Party platforms concerning Jerusalem.

The 2008 platform called for an undivided Jerusalem as Israel's capital

We support Jerusalem as the undivided capital of Israel and moving the American embassy to that undivided capital of Israel. 

While the 2012 platform leaves the divided question open

We support Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state with secure, defensible borders; and we envision two democratic states— Israel with Jerusalem as its capital and Palestine— living in peace and security.

All this just goes to show how the geography of the Holy Land can still stir passions in the Twenty-first century.

Democratic Party's 2012 Platform No Longer Calls for Recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's Capital

Be sure to read Part 2 which discusses the Democratic Party's reversal and the Republican Party's moderation

The issue of what city is the capital of Israel is a political football (and even controversial on geography blogs).  Despite the fact that the seat of Israel's government is in the city, the vast majority of countries are weary of recognizing Jerusalem as Israel's capital out of fear of alienating Arab states and potentially harming dialogue between Israel and various Palestinian factions.

Domestically, all major Republican and Democratic presidential candidates have called for officially recognizing Israel as the capital of Israel since the 1969 Presidential Election between Richard Nixon and Hubert Humphrey.  In 2008, for example, Barack Obama countered claims of being anti-Israel by calling for a united Jerusalem being the capital of Israel (meaning that all of the city should be in Israel and none of it should be in a Palestinian state).  In reality though, calls for an undivided Jerusalem or even recognizing part of Jerusalem as Israel's capital remains political theater for candidates seeking votes.

Therefore it may be somewhat surprising to some political junkies for the Democratic Party to remove calls for recognizing Jerusalem as Israel's capital, though it more closely mirrors reality since no president is willing to formally approve the move.  The 2012 Democratic Party platform states:

President Obama and the Democratic Party maintain an unshakable commitment to Israel’s security. A strong and secure Israel is vital to the United States not simply because we share strategic interests, but also because we share common values. For this reason, despite budgetary constraints, the President has worked with Congress to increase security assistance to Israel every single year since taking office, providing nearly $10 billion in the past three years. The administration has also worked to ensure Israel’s qualitative military edge in the region. And we have deepened defense cooperation – including funding the Iron Dome system – to help Israel address its most pressing threats, including the growing danger posed by rockets and missiles emanating from the Gaza Strip, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. The President’s consistent support for Israel’s right to defend itself and his steadfast opposition to any attempt to delegitimize Israel on the world stage are further evidence of our enduring commitment to Israel’s security.
 
It is precisely because of this commitment that President Obama and the Democratic Party seek peace between Israelis and Palestinians. A just and lasting Israeli-Palestinian accord, producing two states for two peoples, would contribute to regional stability and help sustain Israel’s identity as a Jewish and democratic state. At the same time, the President has made clear that there will be no lasting peace unless Israel’s security concerns are met. President Obama will continue to press Arab states to reach out to Israel. We will continue to support Israel’s peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan, which have been pillars of peace and stability in the region for many years. And even as the President and the Democratic Party continue to encourage all parties to be resolute in the pursuit of peace, we will insist that any Palestinian partner must recognize Israel’s right to exist, reject violence, and adhere to existing agreements.

All this is strong pro-Israel language.  However, to some this shocks since there is no mention of Jerusalem as the capital like previous platforms such as 2008's which stated

Jerusalem is and will remain the capital of Israel. The parties have agreed that Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations. It should remain an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths.

For comparison, the 2012 Republican Party platform (PDF, page 49) calls for Jerusalem being Israel's capital but leaves ambiguity for final status as undivided/divided and potentially also serving as a Palestinian capital.

We support Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state with secure, defensible borders; and we envision two democratic states— Israel with Jerusalem as its capital and Palestine— living in peace and security.

Tuesday, September 04, 2012

September 2012 Travel Photo: Bloody Lane at Antietam



The above photo is the back side of Bloody Lane at Antietam battlefield outside Sharpsburg, Maryland.  During the noon hours of September 17, 1862, Confederate (South) forces used a sunken road to act as a natural trench against wave after wave of Union (North) attacks.  It was not until the third assault that Union troops were able to outflank the defenders, and shoot down into the road.  The sunken road, which was the protector of Southern forces, turned into a death trap.  By 1:00 the road was full of bodies.



A video tour of the Sunken Road by VideoHistoryToday


The sunken road provided a great blind spot for Confederate forces.  While Union forces were forced to fight on top of the ridge in the background, exposing their full bodies, Confederates were mostly hidden.  The above photo has a 6 feet 4 inches tall man standing inside the natural trench.  Below is the same man standing outside the sunken road.


Video documentary about the full Battle of Antietam including the Bloody Lane