data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3fcbf/3fcbf9467870e1b56145516c0caa743c75afdb0f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4441e/4441e100cd47bc2580d6a73aba785be534e8648d" alt=""
The Geography Blog focusing on all things geography: human, physical, technical, space, news, and geopolitics. Also known as Geographic Travels with Catholicgauze! Written by a former National Geographic employee who also proudly served in Iraq and Afghanistan.
2 comments:
I find it fascinating that, although a generalization, counties voted *for* the Republican candidate in the Senate election if the percentage they voted for Obama in 2008 was 65% or less. Counties who voted for our current President in the percentages ranging from 71-77 as a whole voted for the Democratic candidate.
http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/map.html
Also, it might be interesting to compare the map above with the data from Kennedy's 2006 senate election, but it's too bad it's only in table form and not in a map.
http://www.boston.com/news/special/politics/2006_elections/general_results/us_senate.html
Very interesting point Trevor. Looks like you found the spatial difference between union Democrats (Reagan Democrats) and liberal progressive Demographics.
Post a Comment